Gensudo turns your project's context into complete, cited drafts of the documents product decisions depend on. You stay the editor: every draft arrives as a suggestion, never a silent change.
Gensudo drafts complete product documents, including PRDs, business cases and discovery briefs - using your project’s context. Documents are created section by section, with inline citations showing where key information comes from. Each draft is presented as a suggestion for you to accept or reject, never applied without your approval.
Most AI writing tools produce a wall of confident text without showing their working. There are no sources, little understanding of the document’s purpose and no respect for the facts you have already established. The result is content you have to rewrite - while the sections you keep are often the hardest to verify. Decision-grade documents are not created through a single prompt. They are built as a sequence of purposeful sections, each with its own evidence requirements, context and acknowledged gaps. That is how Gensudo drafts.
Pick from 382 templates organised by role and lifecycle phase — a Product Requirements Document, a Business Case, a Product Discovery Brief. Each carries guidance on why it matters now and what good looks like.
One click, charged once. Sections draft one at a time, grounded in your project context and the project's evidence pool. If a run fails partway, it resumes where it stopped — you are never charged twice.
Drafted sections arrive as suggestions to accept or reject. Nothing is silently applied, and each section's draft is checked against what that section is supposed to contain before it reaches you.
Per-section Improve refines the writing while preserving your facts and figures. Your numbers stay your numbers — the AI tightens the argument around them.
When something genuinely is not knowable, the draft says so plainly. You will never find an [insert here] placeholder pretending to be a finished thought.
A full draft is a chunked run: each section is drafted, validated and offered in turn. Because the whole run is charged once up front, a network wobble or a failed section never costs you again - the draft simply picks up where it left off.
Per-section Improve treats the facts and figures you have added as fixed points. It sharpens structure and argument around them, cites what it draws on, and - where the honest answer is 'we do not know yet' - writes exactly that. Then a review pass can push quality further.
AI drafting in Gensudo supports your professional judgement — it never replaces it. Here is exactly where the boundaries sit.
A full document draft is charged once, however many sections it takes and however many times a failed run resumes. Failed AI requests are never charged.
See plans and credits →Drafts and improvements are suggestions to accept or reject. Unreviewed AI output is never treated as final — sign-off remains a human act, and the templates say who should give it.
It will not invent statistics, fabricate customers, or hide a gap behind a placeholder. And a citation is a trail to follow, not a guarantee of truth — checking still belongs to you.
How citations and trust work →A full draft is charged once against your plan’s AI credits, whatever the document’s size. Sections then draft one at a time, and if a run fails it resumes without re-charging. Gensudo bills fairly across the board: failed AI requests are never charged. The Pro plan includes 200 AI credits per cycle at £19 per month.
No. Every draft and every per-section Improve arrives as a suggestion you accept or reject — nothing is silently applied. Improve specifically preserves the facts and figures you have entered, refining the writing around them rather than replacing them.
Drafts are grounded in your project's context and its evidence pool, and claims carry inline citation markers so you can trace where they came from. That makes them checkable, not infallible: AI supports professional judgement rather than replacing it, and a citation is an invitation to verify, not a guarantee. Review before you rely.
It says so. Gensudo's honest-gap policy means that when information genuinely is not knowable — a metric you have not measured, a decision not yet taken — the draft states the gap plainly instead of inventing a figure or leaving an [insert here] placeholder.
Any of the 382 governed templates in the library, organised by role and lifecycle phase — from a Product Requirements Document or Business Case to a Competitive Analysis, Product Roadmap, Persona Document or Product Sunset Assessment. Each template carries guidance on why it matters now and what good looks like.
Yes. Per-section Improve refines a single section while preserving your facts and figures, so you can iterate on the weakest part of a document without touching the rest. A full draft is only needed when you are starting a document from its template.
Set up one project, and see what a cited, decision-grade draft looks like against your own context.